Adoption, Liability, & Results
Q: Does the device only work if the subject is standing still?
A: No — it can be effective even if the subject is moving or running. wrap.com+1
Q: Is there risk of injury, and how is the device removed?
A: The FK FAQ states that the wrap does not constrict, reducing choking or major injury risk. However, any risk must be managed via training. (The FAQ is sparse on removal mechanics — you may want a more detailed internal KB for that.) wrap.com+1
Q: What is the success rate or effectiveness? How is that measured?
A: The FAQ page references deployment data (e.g. body-worn camera reviews) to show successful use, even under less-than-ideal clothing conditions. wrap.com
Q: How does adoption of BolaWrap help an agency manage liability or cost?
A: The WRAP site claims that using pre-escalation tools like BolaWrap can avoid injuries, costly litigation, and lost work hours associated with higher-force interventions. wrap.com
Q: Are agencies replacing tasers or other tools with BolaWrap?
A: The FAQ hints at comparative substitution in some cases, though specifics are not deeply detailed on the FAQ page. wrap.com+1
Q: How many agencies use the device / what’s the deployment track record?
A: The FAQ mentions multiple agencies using it globally, and that field deployment data is available (e.g. in body-worn camera reviews). wrap.com+1